Why Referees Reject Manuscripts

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents the results of content analysis of 373 referees' reports of manuscripts submitted to 35 hospitality and tourism journals where rejection or major revision was recommended. Failed manuscripts had multiple shortcomings, with referees identifying an average of 6.2 deficiencies per article. The most common areas where referees found fault with manuscripts were methodology (74% of papers), failure to elucidate significance effectively (60%), poor writing style (58%) and a weak literature review (50%). The study concluded that communications' problems were more common than technical flaws.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-470
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Hospitality and Tourism Research
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Keywords

  • referee
  • rejection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this