Abstract
Although prior research suggests strict, fair value-based securities accounting rules cause banks to sell securities into negative liquidity shocks, a value-destroying behavior called “liquidity feedback trading,” the mechanism is uncertain. We find the sooner chief executive officers (CEOs) are permitted to cash out of their stock and option grants, the more prone are their banks to feedback trading. Furthermore, the sooner CEOs can cash out, the more positive their banks' stock price reaction to news of accounting rule relaxation. We conclude incentives for managerial short-term focus are a mechanism by which stricter accounting rules cause feedback trading. We also find evidence that regulatory compliance concerns play a role.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6234-6254 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Management Science |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Early online date | 1 Nov 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2024 |
Keywords
- bank liquidity provision
- banking
- capital regulation
- CEO incentives
- CEO pay duration
- fair value accounting
- financial crises
- other-than-temporary impairments
- real earnings management
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Strategy and Management
- Management Science and Operations Research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When Myopic Managers Must Mark to Market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver