TY - JOUR
T1 - Valuing options to renew at future market value
T2 - the case of commercial property leases
AU - Wang, Jenny Jing
AU - Shen, Jianfu
AU - Pretorius, Frederik
N1 - Funding Information:
Shen acknowledges research grants (P0030199 and P0038209) from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - In this study, we develop and empirically test a valuation model for a commonly encountered option in office leases: a tenant’s option to renew at future market rent (a fair market value) with lease termination as the maturity date. The model integrates decision analysis with real options analysis and market risk with private risks. “Option value” is defined as the private value of the option to either party pre-contract, while “option price” assumes a fair agreement between transacting parties and can be positive (rental premium paid) or negative (rental discount offered). Without manifest expectations, an analysis of a sample of office leases supports the model’s logic with price estimates in a practical range. The tenants’ option price/value is shown to have a negative relationship with the original/renewal lease term; conversely, the landlords’ option value is positively related to the original/renewal term. Comparative analyses show that transaction costs have a positive effect on tenants’ option value and on prices, while vacancy costs and the vacancy period are both positively related to the landlords’ option value and negatively related to price. Market rent is found to have a negative relationship with option price. Overall, this study provides a theoretical analysis and empirical tests of the value of a real option that allows option holders to renew/extend their contracts at a fair market value.
AB - In this study, we develop and empirically test a valuation model for a commonly encountered option in office leases: a tenant’s option to renew at future market rent (a fair market value) with lease termination as the maturity date. The model integrates decision analysis with real options analysis and market risk with private risks. “Option value” is defined as the private value of the option to either party pre-contract, while “option price” assumes a fair agreement between transacting parties and can be positive (rental premium paid) or negative (rental discount offered). Without manifest expectations, an analysis of a sample of office leases supports the model’s logic with price estimates in a practical range. The tenants’ option price/value is shown to have a negative relationship with the original/renewal lease term; conversely, the landlords’ option value is positively related to the original/renewal term. Comparative analyses show that transaction costs have a positive effect on tenants’ option value and on prices, while vacancy costs and the vacancy period are both positively related to the landlords’ option value and negatively related to price. Market rent is found to have a negative relationship with option price. Overall, this study provides a theoretical analysis and empirical tests of the value of a real option that allows option holders to renew/extend their contracts at a fair market value.
KW - Commercial property leases
KW - Fair market value renewal
KW - Integrated method
KW - Real option
KW - Valuation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152558954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40854-023-00479-1
DO - 10.1186/s40854-023-00479-1
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85152558954
SN - 2199-4730
VL - 9
JO - Financial Innovation
JF - Financial Innovation
IS - 1
M1 - 70
ER -