Abstract
Purpose: Early identification of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is important as timely interventions are beneficial and cost-effective. Unrecognized BPD not only results in suffering for individuals and their families, but also leads to considerable social costs. Although web-based measures have the potential to facilitate screening assessment of BPD for research and clinical purposes, little is known about whether the results of web-based measures of BPD are valid. This preliminary study aims to examine the validity of a web-based measure of BPD.
Method: We analyzed data from five independent samples (N = 828 in total).
Results: The web-based BPD measure had a consistent relationship with relevant variables, including trauma exposure, mental well-being, depression, post-traumatic stress, dissociation and psychotic features across samples. It was also strongly correlated with another BPD measure. The web-based BPD measure could discriminate between participants with and without BPD and the discrimination performance was excellent (area under the curve =.853).
Discussion: The initial findings suggest that the web-based BPD measure used in the present study is valid and may be helpful for research and screening purposes, although it should be followed up with a more comprehensive assessment in clinical settings. Implications are discussed. Given the limitations in this study, further studies are needed.
Method: We analyzed data from five independent samples (N = 828 in total).
Results: The web-based BPD measure had a consistent relationship with relevant variables, including trauma exposure, mental well-being, depression, post-traumatic stress, dissociation and psychotic features across samples. It was also strongly correlated with another BPD measure. The web-based BPD measure could discriminate between participants with and without BPD and the discrimination performance was excellent (area under the curve =.853).
Discussion: The initial findings suggest that the web-based BPD measure used in the present study is valid and may be helpful for research and screening purposes, although it should be followed up with a more comprehensive assessment in clinical settings. Implications are discussed. Given the limitations in this study, further studies are needed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 443-456 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2020 |
Keywords
- Borderline personality disorder
- information and communication technology
- mental health
- online assessment
- validation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology