Abstract
This study investigates position bias in tourist decision-making, focusing on how response latency influences preferences for sequentially presented information online. Using a best–worst scaling experiment and discrete choice modeling, findings reveal two distinct classes of decision-makers based on cognitive engagement. Individuals with shorter response latency exhibit a pronounced preference for top-listed attributes, indicating a primacy effect; those with longer response latency show a more balanced evaluation of options. Moreover, the time spent on deliberation correlates with preferences, suggesting that response time is a significant factor in position bias. Findings provide valuable insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying position bias in the online decision-making process. Study results also shed light on the contextual and individual factors associated with position bias, which provide managerial implications to enhance marketing strategies by tailoring them to decision-making styles.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1227-1240 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | Feb 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2025 |
Keywords
- behavioral economics
- best–worst scaling
- dual processing
- position-bias
- response latency
- tourist decision-making
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management