TY - JOUR
T1 - Two-facility location games with minimum distance requirement
AU - Xu, Xinping
AU - Li, Bo
AU - Li, Minming
AU - Duan, Lingjie
N1 - Funding Information:
Part of work has been presented in the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2019), Montreal, Canada, May 13-17, 2019 (Duan et al., 2019). Bo Li was supported by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Grant NO. P0034420). Minming Li is also from City University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China. Minming Li was supported by a grant from Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. CityU 11200518) and was partially sponsored by Project 11771365 supported by NSFC. Lingjie Duan is also with Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society, Shenzhen, China 518040. Lingjie Duan was supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund Tier 2 Grant (Project No. MOE2016-T2-1-173).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 AI Access Foundation. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - We study the mechanism design problem of a social planner for locating two facilities on a line interval [0, 1], where a set of n strategic agents report their locations and a mechanism determines the locations of the two facilities. We consider the requirement of a minimum distance 0 ≤ d ≤ 1 between the two facilities. Given the two facilities are heterogeneous, we model the cost/utility of an agent as the sum of his distances to both facilities. In the heterogeneous two-facility location game to minimize the social cost, we show that the optimal solution can be computed in polynomial time and prove that carefully choosing one optimal solution as output is strategyproof. We also design a strategyproof mechanism minimizing the maximum cost. Given the two facilities are homogeneous, we model the cost/utility of an agent as his distance to the closer facility. In the homogeneous two-facility location game for minimizing the social cost, we show that any deterministic strategyproof mechanism has unbounded approximation ratio. Moreover, in the obnoxious heterogeneous two-facility location game for maximizing the social utility, we propose new deterministic group strategyproof mechanisms with provable approximation ratios and establish a lower bound (7 − d)/6 for any deterministic strategyproof mechanism. We also design a strategyproof mechanism maximizing the minimum utility. In the obnoxious homogeneous two-facility location game for maximizing the social utility, we propose deterministic group strategyproof mechanisms with provable approximation ratios and establish a lower bound 4/3. Besides, in the two-facility location game with triple-preference, where each facility may be favorable, obnoxious, indifferent for any agent, we further motivate agents to report both their locations and preferences towards the two facilities truthfully, and design a deterministic group strategyproof mechanism with an approximation ratio 4.
AB - We study the mechanism design problem of a social planner for locating two facilities on a line interval [0, 1], where a set of n strategic agents report their locations and a mechanism determines the locations of the two facilities. We consider the requirement of a minimum distance 0 ≤ d ≤ 1 between the two facilities. Given the two facilities are heterogeneous, we model the cost/utility of an agent as the sum of his distances to both facilities. In the heterogeneous two-facility location game to minimize the social cost, we show that the optimal solution can be computed in polynomial time and prove that carefully choosing one optimal solution as output is strategyproof. We also design a strategyproof mechanism minimizing the maximum cost. Given the two facilities are homogeneous, we model the cost/utility of an agent as his distance to the closer facility. In the homogeneous two-facility location game for minimizing the social cost, we show that any deterministic strategyproof mechanism has unbounded approximation ratio. Moreover, in the obnoxious heterogeneous two-facility location game for maximizing the social utility, we propose new deterministic group strategyproof mechanisms with provable approximation ratios and establish a lower bound (7 − d)/6 for any deterministic strategyproof mechanism. We also design a strategyproof mechanism maximizing the minimum utility. In the obnoxious homogeneous two-facility location game for maximizing the social utility, we propose deterministic group strategyproof mechanisms with provable approximation ratios and establish a lower bound 4/3. Besides, in the two-facility location game with triple-preference, where each facility may be favorable, obnoxious, indifferent for any agent, we further motivate agents to report both their locations and preferences towards the two facilities truthfully, and design a deterministic group strategyproof mechanism with an approximation ratio 4.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102594373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1613/JAIR.1.12319
DO - 10.1613/JAIR.1.12319
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85102594373
SN - 1076-9757
VL - 70
SP - 719
EP - 756
JO - Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
JF - Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
ER -