TY - JOUR
T1 - Tracking and predicting the treatment adherence of patients under rehabilitation
T2 - a three-wave longitudinal validation study for the Rehabilitation Adherence Inventory
AU - Lee, Alfred S.Y.
AU - Xu, Shebe Siwei
AU - Yung, Patrick S.H.
AU - Ong, Michael T.Y.
AU - Chan, Chetwyn C.H.
AU - Chung, Joan S.K.
AU - Chan, Derwin K.C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Lee, Xu, Yung, Ong, Chan, Chung and Chan.
PY - 2024/4/12
Y1 - 2024/4/12
N2 - This study aimed to develop and validate a new measurement tool, the Rehabilitation Adherence Inventory (RAI), to measure patients’ rehabilitation adherence. We recruited 236 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures from the United Kingdom (Mage = 33.58 ± 10.03, range = 18 to 59; female = 46.2%). Participants completed a survey, that measured their rehabilitation adherence, rehabilitation volume, psychological needs support, autonomous motivation, and intention at baseline, and at the 2nd and 4th month. Factorial, convergent, discriminant, concurrent, predictive, ecological validity and test–retest reliability of the RAI were tested via exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modelling (SEM). All the EFAs, CFAs, and SEMs yielded acceptable to excellent goodness-of-fit, χ2 = 10.51 to 224.12, df = 9 to 161, CFI > 0.95, TLI > 0.95, RMSEA <0.09 [90%C I < 0.06 to 0.12], SRMR <0.04. Results fully supported the RAI’s factorial, convergent, discriminant, and ecological validity, and test–retest reliability. The concurrent and predictive validity of the RAI was only partially supported because the RAI scores at baseline was positively associated with rehabilitation frequency at all time points (r = 0.34 to 0.38, p < 0.001), but its corresponding associations with rehabilitation duration were not statistically significant (p = 0.07 to 0.93). Overall, our findings suggest that this six-item RAI is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating patients’ rehabilitation adherence.
AB - This study aimed to develop and validate a new measurement tool, the Rehabilitation Adherence Inventory (RAI), to measure patients’ rehabilitation adherence. We recruited 236 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures from the United Kingdom (Mage = 33.58 ± 10.03, range = 18 to 59; female = 46.2%). Participants completed a survey, that measured their rehabilitation adherence, rehabilitation volume, psychological needs support, autonomous motivation, and intention at baseline, and at the 2nd and 4th month. Factorial, convergent, discriminant, concurrent, predictive, ecological validity and test–retest reliability of the RAI were tested via exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modelling (SEM). All the EFAs, CFAs, and SEMs yielded acceptable to excellent goodness-of-fit, χ2 = 10.51 to 224.12, df = 9 to 161, CFI > 0.95, TLI > 0.95, RMSEA <0.09 [90%C I < 0.06 to 0.12], SRMR <0.04. Results fully supported the RAI’s factorial, convergent, discriminant, and ecological validity, and test–retest reliability. The concurrent and predictive validity of the RAI was only partially supported because the RAI scores at baseline was positively associated with rehabilitation frequency at all time points (r = 0.34 to 0.38, p < 0.001), but its corresponding associations with rehabilitation duration were not statistically significant (p = 0.07 to 0.93). Overall, our findings suggest that this six-item RAI is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating patients’ rehabilitation adherence.
KW - ACL
KW - rehabilitation adherence
KW - self-determination theory
KW - sports medicine
KW - theory of planned behavior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191402039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1284745
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1284745
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85191402039
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1284745
ER -