Abstract
Though design management has become influential and been viewed as a key element for business s uccess in rece nt years , it sti ll is conside red as a n under-researched and under- developed discipline with a l ack of body of knowledge. In this instance, survey and case study were initially considered as the best research methods for accumulating information. Moreover, a new research approach has em erged recently: a mixed method with qualitative and quantitative. Within studies of de sign m anagement, h owever, few e xplained t he reasons f or em ploying t hese research methods. This paper explored the reasons through analyzing previous studies of design management. As a resu lt, three ways of knowing d esign management: qualitative, qu antitative, and combined approach, were obtained. It is indicated that they not only emerge as a response of different recognizing stages, also represent different epistemologies of design management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | IASDR 2009: Design/Rigor & Relevance proceedings |
| Pages | 2161-2172 |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
| Event | IASDR 2009: Design/Rigor & Relevance - Duration: 18 Oct 2009 → … |
Conference
| Conference | IASDR 2009: Design/Rigor & Relevance |
|---|---|
| Period | 18/10/09 → … |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The way of knowing design management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver