Abstract
Background: While guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are widely available, clinical uptake of guidelines remains low. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (GCCP) on patient outcomes. Patients and methods: This prospective, observational multicenter study enrolled chemotherapy-naive adults initiating single-day highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer. Patients completed 6-day daily diaries beginning with cycle 1 for up to three chemotherapy cycles. The primary study end point, complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue therapy) during 120 h after cycle 1 chemotherapy, was compared between GCCP and guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GICP) cohorts using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounding factors. Results: In cycle 1 (N = 991), use of GCCP was 55% and 46% during acute and delayed phases, respectively, and 29% for the overall study period (acute plus delayed phases). Complete response was recorded by 172/287 (59.9%) and 357/704 (50.7%) patients in GCCP and GICP cohorts, respectively (P = 0.008). The adjusted odds ratio for complete response was 1.43 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.97; P = 0.027) for patients receiving GCCP versus GICP. Conclusion: GCCP reduces the incidence of CINV after single-day HEC and MEC.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | mds021 |
Pages (from-to) | 1986-1992 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Annals of Oncology |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Antiemetic therapy
- Chemotherapy
- Emesis
- Guidelines
- Nausea
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Hematology
- Oncology