TY - JOUR
T1 - The classification of scoliosis braces developed by SOSORT with SRS, ISPO, and POSNA and approved by ESPRM
AU - Negrini, Stefano
AU - Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele
AU - Cerny, Pavel
AU - de Mauroy, Jean Claude
AU - McAviney, Jeb
AU - Mills, Andrew
AU - Donzelli, Sabrina
AU - Grivas, Theodoros B.
AU - Hresko, M. Timothy
AU - Kotwicki, Tomasz
AU - Labelle, Hubert
AU - Marcotte, Louise
AU - Matthews, Martin
AU - O’Brien, Joe
AU - Parent, Eric C.
AU - Price, Nigel
AU - Manuel, Rigo
AU - Stikeleather, Luke
AU - Vitale, Michael G.
AU - Wong, Man Sang
AU - Wood, Grant
AU - Wynne, James
AU - Zaina, Fabio
AU - Bruno, Marco Brayda
AU - Würsching, Suncica Bulat
AU - Caglar, Yilgor
AU - Cahill, Patrick
AU - Dema, Eugenio
AU - Knott, Patrick
AU - Lebel, Andrea
AU - Lein, Grigorii
AU - Newton, Peter O.
AU - Smith, Brian G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/2/21
Y1 - 2022/2/21
N2 - Purpose: Studies have shown that bracing is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. According to the current classification, almost all braces fall in the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) category. Consequently, the generalization of scientific results is either impossible or misleading. This study aims to produce a classification of the brace types. Methods: Four scientific societies (SOSORT, SRS, ISPO, and POSNA) invited all their members to be part of the study. Six level 1 experts developed the initial classifications. At a consensus meeting with 26 other experts and societies’ officials, thematic analysis and general discussion allowed to define the classification (minimum 80% agreement). The classification was applied to the braces published in the literature and officially approved by the 4 scientific societies and by ESPRM. Results: The classification is based on the following classificatory items: anatomy (CTLSO, TLSO, LSO), rigidity (very rigid, rigid, elastic), primary corrective plane (frontal, sagittal, transverse, frontal & sagittal, frontal & transverse, sagittal & transverse, three-dimensional), construction—valves (monocot, bivalve, multisegmented), construction—closure (dorsal, lateral, ventral), and primary action (bending, detorsion, elongation, movement, push-up, three points). The experts developed a definition for each item and were able to classify the 15 published braces into nine groups. Conclusion: The classification is based on the best current expertise (the lowest level of evidence). Experts recognize that this is the first edition and will change with future understanding and research. The broad application of this classification could have value for brace research, education, clinical practice, and growth in this field.
AB - Purpose: Studies have shown that bracing is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. According to the current classification, almost all braces fall in the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) category. Consequently, the generalization of scientific results is either impossible or misleading. This study aims to produce a classification of the brace types. Methods: Four scientific societies (SOSORT, SRS, ISPO, and POSNA) invited all their members to be part of the study. Six level 1 experts developed the initial classifications. At a consensus meeting with 26 other experts and societies’ officials, thematic analysis and general discussion allowed to define the classification (minimum 80% agreement). The classification was applied to the braces published in the literature and officially approved by the 4 scientific societies and by ESPRM. Results: The classification is based on the following classificatory items: anatomy (CTLSO, TLSO, LSO), rigidity (very rigid, rigid, elastic), primary corrective plane (frontal, sagittal, transverse, frontal & sagittal, frontal & transverse, sagittal & transverse, three-dimensional), construction—valves (monocot, bivalve, multisegmented), construction—closure (dorsal, lateral, ventral), and primary action (bending, detorsion, elongation, movement, push-up, three points). The experts developed a definition for each item and were able to classify the 15 published braces into nine groups. Conclusion: The classification is based on the best current expertise (the lowest level of evidence). Experts recognize that this is the first edition and will change with future understanding and research. The broad application of this classification could have value for brace research, education, clinical practice, and growth in this field.
KW - Brace
KW - Classification
KW - Idiopathic scoliosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124989401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-022-07131-z
DO - 10.1007/s00586-022-07131-z
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35190896
AN - SCOPUS:85124989401
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 31
SP - 980
EP - 989
JO - European Spine Journal
JF - European Spine Journal
IS - 4
ER -