TY - JOUR
T1 - The breadth of normative standards
T2 - Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations
AU - Madan, Shilpa
AU - Basu, Shankha
AU - Ng, Sharon
AU - Savani, Krishna
N1 - Funding Information:
Parts of this research were conducted when Krishna Savani was at Nanyang Technological University. We thank Elison Lim, Michael W. Morris, Chi-Yue Chiu, Mohit Wadhawan, and seminar participants at SPSP, AOM, Columbia Business School, University of Michigan, University of Leeds, and Virginia Tech for their helpful feedback. We are grateful to Velvetina Lim, Ee Hwee Lau, Dayana Bulchand, Andrea Low, Sylvia Chin, Neeraj Pandey, Caroline Zoufaly, Sydney Johnson, Tara Hackett, Shermaine Yeo, and Pei May Ng for invaluable assistance with this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Normative standards refer to ideals to which people, products, and organizations are held. The present research (N = 2,224) investigates a novel construct—the breadth of normative standards, or the number of criteria that normative standards need to meet. Using archival and primary data in both organizational and consumer contexts, Studies 1–2 found that Indians’ and Singaporeans’ normative standards in several domains (e.g., a good job, a good body wash) needed to satisfy more criteria than those of Americans and the British. Using incentive-compatible designs, Studies 3–5 identified two downstream consequences of broader normative standards; decision-makers with broader standards pay greater attention to detail when evaluating others’ work, and people with broader standards search for more options, even at a cost, before making a choice. This research complements past work on norms as prevalent behaviors, values, and attitudes by examining norms as standards, and documents consequences of the breadth of normative standards for employees and organizations.
AB - Normative standards refer to ideals to which people, products, and organizations are held. The present research (N = 2,224) investigates a novel construct—the breadth of normative standards, or the number of criteria that normative standards need to meet. Using archival and primary data in both organizational and consumer contexts, Studies 1–2 found that Indians’ and Singaporeans’ normative standards in several domains (e.g., a good job, a good body wash) needed to satisfy more criteria than those of Americans and the British. Using incentive-compatible designs, Studies 3–5 identified two downstream consequences of broader normative standards; decision-makers with broader standards pay greater attention to detail when evaluating others’ work, and people with broader standards search for more options, even at a cost, before making a choice. This research complements past work on norms as prevalent behaviors, values, and attitudes by examining norms as standards, and documents consequences of the breadth of normative standards for employees and organizations.
KW - Attention to detail
KW - Criteria
KW - Culture
KW - Maximizing
KW - Normative standards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136485393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104181
DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104181
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85136485393
SN - 0749-5978
VL - 172
JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
M1 - 104181
ER -