Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Techno-economical evaluation and comparison of various CO2 transportation pathways

  • Mustafa Cakartas
  • , Jianzhao Zhou
  • , Jingzheng Ren
  • , Anders Andreasen
  • , Haoshui Yu

Research output: Chapter in book / Conference proceeding › Chapter in an edited book (as author) › Academic research › peer-review

Abstract

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is regarded as one of the most promising solutions for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. Following capture, the CO2 must be transported to the designated storage site. This transportation process can be achieved via various means, such as trucks/trains, or ships. Considerable research has focused on optimizing CO2 transportation, particularly on converting CO2 from a gas to a liquid to reduce volume and transportation costs. After thorough evaluation, it has been determined that acquiring CO2 at 7 bar and -49 °C, as well as at 15 bar and -28 °C, represents the most efficient and cost-effective options for truck/train and ship transportation. To transport CO2 in liquid state, liquefaction is a critical step in the pathway. In this paper, three different liquefaction systems including internal refrigeration (open liquefaction), external refrigeration (closed liquefaction) and precooled Linde Hampson process (open liquefaction) were studied. Each process was simulated in Aspen HYSYS, and optimized with a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm in MATLAB to minimize the energy consumption. Afterwards, cost analysis was conducted to compare the liquefaction processes in terms of levelized cost. This study found that precooled Linde Hampson liquefaction process is the most cost-effective for the 7 bar scenario, with a cost of 19.18 $/tCO2 liquified. On the other hand, it was found that the lowest levelized cost is given by external liquefaction with the use of ammonia as refrigerant for 15 bar case, with a levelized cost of 17.54 $/tCO2 liquified.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputer Aided Chemical Engineering
PublisherElsevier B.V.
Pages2077-2082
Number of pages6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Publication series

NameComputer Aided Chemical Engineering
Volume53
ISSN (Print)1570-7946

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • Carbon capture and storage
  • External refrigeration
  • Internal refrigeration
  • Precooled Linde Hampson process
  • Transportation of CO

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Techno-economical evaluation and comparison of various CO2 transportation pathways'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this