Subjective outcome evaluation based on the program participants : does dosage matter?

Tan Lei Shek, Hildie Leung

Research output: Chapter in book / Conference proceedingChapter in an edited book (as author)Academic research


Subjective outcome evaluation findings based on the participants of the Project P.A.T.H.S. collected from 2005 to 2009 were examined in this chapter with particular reference to program dosage (i.e., 10-h program vs. 20-h program). Results showed that participants generally had positive evaluations of the program, implementers, and benefits of the Tier 1 Program. While respondents in the 20-h full program perceived the program implementers more positively than those in the 10-h core program, program dosage did not influence participants’ perception of the qualities of program content and program effectiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDevelopment and evaluation of positive adolescent training through holistic social programs (P.A.T.H.S.)
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9789814451543, 9814451541
ISBN (Print)9789814451536, 9814451533
Publication statusPublished - 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'Subjective outcome evaluation based on the program participants : does dosage matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this