TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process
AU - the Promoting Equity in Refractive Error Services in the Western Pacific Study Group
AU - McCormick, Ian
AU - Tong, Kelvin
AU - Abdullah, Nurliyana
AU - Abesamis-Dischoso, Carmen
AU - Gende, Theresa
AU - Hashim, Effendy Bin
AU - Ho, S. May
AU - Jalbert, Isabelle
AU - Jeronimo, Belmerio
AU - Matoto-Raikabakaba, Elenoa
AU - Ono, Koichi
AU - Piyasena, Prabhath Nishantha
AU - Rogers, Jaymie T.
AU - Szetu, John
AU - Tran, Minh Anh
AU - Tse, Dennis Yan yin
AU - Win, Ye
AU - Yap, Tiong Peng
AU - Yoon, Sangchul
AU - Yusufu, Mayinuer
AU - Burton, Matthew J.
AU - Ramke, Jacqueline
AU - Burnett, Anthea M.
AU - Yashadhana, Aryati
AU - Hopkins, Shelley O.S.
AU - Jan, Catherine L.
AU - Taylor, Hugh R.
AU - Bi, Hongshen
AU - Kang, Mengtain
AU - Wang, Ningli
AU - Yang, Xiaohui
AU - Pan, Chen Wei
AU - Wang, Yan
AU - Wu, Min
AU - Zhong, Hua
AU - Zou, Haidong
AU - Ansari, Harris Muzammil
AU - Qoqonokana, Mundi Q.
AU - Shih, Kendrick
AU - Hiratsuka, Yoshimune
AU - Kawasaki, Ryo
AU - Ahmad, Norsham
AU - Othman, Shah Farez
AU - Barodawala, Fakhruddin Shamseer
AU - Hussin, Duratul Ain
AU - Ngah, Farziah
AU - Isa, Mohd Zaki A.
AU - Ali, Bariah Mohd
AU - Modidin, Norhani
AU - Liu, Yu Chi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.
PY - 2024/6/16
Y1 - 2024/6/16
N2 - Purpose: Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment globally; however, little attention has been given to equity and access to services. This study aimed to identify and prioritise: (1) strategies to address inequity of access to refractive error services and (2) population groups to target with these strategies in five sub-regions within the Western Pacific. Methods: We invited eye care professionals to complete a two-round online prioritisation process. In round 1, panellists nominated population groups least able to access refractive error services, and strategies to improve access. Responses were summarised and presented in round 2, where panellists ranked the groups (by extent of difficulty and size) and strategies (in terms of reach, acceptability, sustainability, feasibility and equity). Groups and strategies were scored according to their rank within each sub-region. Results: Seventy five people from 17 countries completed both rounds (55% women). Regional differences were evident. Indigenous peoples were a priority group for improving access in Australasia and Southeast Asia, while East Asia identified refugees and Oceania identified rural/remote people. Across the five sub-regions, reducing out-of-pocket costs was a commonly prioritised strategy for refraction and spectacles. Australasia prioritised improving cultural safety, East Asia prioritised strengthening school eye health programmes and Oceania and Southeast Asia prioritised outreach to rural areas. Conclusion: These results provide policy-makers, researchers and funders with a starting point for context-specific actions to improve access to refractive error services, particularly among underserved population groups who may be left behind in existing private sector-dominated models of care.
AB - Purpose: Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment globally; however, little attention has been given to equity and access to services. This study aimed to identify and prioritise: (1) strategies to address inequity of access to refractive error services and (2) population groups to target with these strategies in five sub-regions within the Western Pacific. Methods: We invited eye care professionals to complete a two-round online prioritisation process. In round 1, panellists nominated population groups least able to access refractive error services, and strategies to improve access. Responses were summarised and presented in round 2, where panellists ranked the groups (by extent of difficulty and size) and strategies (in terms of reach, acceptability, sustainability, feasibility and equity). Groups and strategies were scored according to their rank within each sub-region. Results: Seventy five people from 17 countries completed both rounds (55% women). Regional differences were evident. Indigenous peoples were a priority group for improving access in Australasia and Southeast Asia, while East Asia identified refugees and Oceania identified rural/remote people. Across the five sub-regions, reducing out-of-pocket costs was a commonly prioritised strategy for refraction and spectacles. Australasia prioritised improving cultural safety, East Asia prioritised strengthening school eye health programmes and Oceania and Southeast Asia prioritised outreach to rural areas. Conclusion: These results provide policy-makers, researchers and funders with a starting point for context-specific actions to improve access to refractive error services, particularly among underserved population groups who may be left behind in existing private sector-dominated models of care.
KW - access
KW - equity
KW - financial protection
KW - refraction
KW - refractive error
KW - spectacles
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196411508
U2 - 10.1111/opo.13348
DO - 10.1111/opo.13348
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85196411508
SN - 0275-5408
VL - 44
SP - 1148
EP - 1161
JO - Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
JF - Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
IS - 6
ER -