TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategic reaction and tax avoidance
T2 - Evidence from the effect of large IPOs on peers
AU - Chen, Huimin (Amy)
AU - Francis, Bill B.
AU - Wu, Qiang
AU - Zhao, Yijiang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 British Accounting Association
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - We examine whether and how industry peers use tax avoidance as a strategic mechanism to maintain their relative competitive positions. We exploit a unique setting where a relatively large private firm obtains capital, visibility, and creditability by going public (i.e., an IPO), imposing significant competitive pressure on its industry peers. We find that peer firms increase tax avoidance after large IPOs. Further analysis shows that the increase of tax avoidance is driven by firms with high growth needs and firms with high operating uncertainty, suggesting that tax aggressiveness is aligned with other strategic risk-taking changes to improve industry competitiveness. We rule out two alternative explanations: 1) existing peers use relative product market power to hedge against tax risk and engage in tax avoidance; 2) peers mimic the tax avoidance behavior of IPO firms. The main finding is supported by the difference-in-differences test with coarsened exact matching and a battery of robustness tests, including alternative measures and alternative large IPO selection criteria.
AB - We examine whether and how industry peers use tax avoidance as a strategic mechanism to maintain their relative competitive positions. We exploit a unique setting where a relatively large private firm obtains capital, visibility, and creditability by going public (i.e., an IPO), imposing significant competitive pressure on its industry peers. We find that peer firms increase tax avoidance after large IPOs. Further analysis shows that the increase of tax avoidance is driven by firms with high growth needs and firms with high operating uncertainty, suggesting that tax aggressiveness is aligned with other strategic risk-taking changes to improve industry competitiveness. We rule out two alternative explanations: 1) existing peers use relative product market power to hedge against tax risk and engage in tax avoidance; 2) peers mimic the tax avoidance behavior of IPO firms. The main finding is supported by the difference-in-differences test with coarsened exact matching and a battery of robustness tests, including alternative measures and alternative large IPO selection criteria.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147584038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2023.101187
DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2023.101187
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85147584038
SN - 0890-8389
VL - 55
JO - British Accounting Review
JF - British Accounting Review
IS - 3
M1 - 101187
ER -