Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Strategic ESG Priorities and Materiality Assessments: Evidence from Hong Kong Listed Fashion and Textile Firms

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

Abstract

Firms increasingly rely on ESG materiality assessments to prioritise sustainability issues under heightened stakeholder scrutiny. Yet the strategic consequences of materiality beyond firm-level disclosure remain underexplored. This study examines how materiality assessments shape ESG prioritisation at the industry level using sustainability disclosures from 44 Hong Kong–listed fashion and textile firms. Applying a standardised ESG taxonomy and percentile-based normalisation, we aggregate firm-level materiality matrices into a comparable sector benchmark. The findings reveal systematic convergence around a narrow set of social issues, particularly supply chain and labour-related topics, alongside weaker and more dispersed prioritisation of environmental and governance concerns. Although internal and stakeholder assessments are moderately aligned, environmental challenges occupy less prominent positions in the aggregated matrix. These results suggest that materiality assessments function as sector-level attention-structuring mechanisms that stabilise governable risks while constraining the strategic visibility of diffuse environmental impacts.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBusiness Strategy and the Environment
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • ESG materiality
  • ESG strategy
  • fashion and textile industry
  • managerial attention
  • strategic prioritisation
  • sustainability governance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategic ESG Priorities and Materiality Assessments: Evidence from Hong Kong Listed Fashion and Textile Firms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this