TY - GEN
T1 - Sound extrapolation methods for turbulent flows based on indirect acoustic variables
AU - Zhong, Siyang
AU - Zhang, Xin
AU - Morfey, Christopher L.
AU - Sandberg, Richard
AU - Fattah, Ryu
N1 - Funding Information:
A part of Siyang Zhong’s thesis research is supported by the Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission (ref. ITS/038/15FP). Part of the study is conducted in AVIC-AANTC under HK R&D ARI 1718026. This work was performed in Aerodynamics, Acoustics & Noise Control Technology Centre at
Funding Information:
A part of Siyang Zhong’s thesis research is supported by the Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission (ref. ITS/038/15FP). Part of the study is conducted in AVIC-AANTC under HK R&D ARI 1718026. This work was performed in Aerodynamics, Acoustics & Noise Control Technology Centre at HKUST Shenzhen Research Institue (SRI), China (aantc.ust.hk).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - In computing sound radiation from a turbulent flow, the far-field directivity solutions based on sound extrapolation methods can be contaminated if the expensive volume integrals are neglected while the non-acoustic fluctuations are collected on the integration surface. In earlier work by the first two authors, a sound extrapolation method was developed by filtering out the eddies before the far-field computation. A convection operator Dc was applied on the pressure fluctuation p′ under the assumption that the motion of the eddies is mainly convected by the mean flow, as indicated by Taylor's hypothesis. Good results were obtained when the method was applied to typical aeroacoustic problems. In this work, we develop two more formulations using alternative indirect acoustic variables. The first method is based on the convection operator Dc to the velocity fluctuation u′ that seems to be more relevant to Taylor's hypothesis. The second method uses u′ = ∇ ·u′ as the acoustic variable based on the fact that the sound waves are related to the compressive process of a fluid medium. The methods are studied using different benchmark problems and practical aeroacoustic applications. It is shown that all methods work well for the two-dimensional (2D) convecting vortex, an acoustic monopole in uniform flow and the at plate - gust interaction problem. However, when the three methods are applied to vortex- shedding noise and to co-owing jet noise, the original method based on Dcp′ shows least sensitivity to choice of integration surface, and results obtained using different integration surfaces with the variables v′ and Dcu′ are inconsistent. It is found that the reason for the poor performance is that non-acoustic components are also contained in the indirect variables v′ and Dcu′ on the integration surfaces.
AB - In computing sound radiation from a turbulent flow, the far-field directivity solutions based on sound extrapolation methods can be contaminated if the expensive volume integrals are neglected while the non-acoustic fluctuations are collected on the integration surface. In earlier work by the first two authors, a sound extrapolation method was developed by filtering out the eddies before the far-field computation. A convection operator Dc was applied on the pressure fluctuation p′ under the assumption that the motion of the eddies is mainly convected by the mean flow, as indicated by Taylor's hypothesis. Good results were obtained when the method was applied to typical aeroacoustic problems. In this work, we develop two more formulations using alternative indirect acoustic variables. The first method is based on the convection operator Dc to the velocity fluctuation u′ that seems to be more relevant to Taylor's hypothesis. The second method uses u′ = ∇ ·u′ as the acoustic variable based on the fact that the sound waves are related to the compressive process of a fluid medium. The methods are studied using different benchmark problems and practical aeroacoustic applications. It is shown that all methods work well for the two-dimensional (2D) convecting vortex, an acoustic monopole in uniform flow and the at plate - gust interaction problem. However, when the three methods are applied to vortex- shedding noise and to co-owing jet noise, the original method based on Dcp′ shows least sensitivity to choice of integration surface, and results obtained using different integration surfaces with the variables v′ and Dcu′ are inconsistent. It is found that the reason for the poor performance is that non-acoustic components are also contained in the indirect variables v′ and Dcu′ on the integration surfaces.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051302033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2018-2804
DO - 10.2514/6.2018-2804
M3 - Conference article published in proceeding or book
AN - SCOPUS:85051302033
SN - 9781624105609
T3 - 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference
BT - 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)
T2 - AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2018
Y2 - 25 June 2018 through 29 June 2018
ER -