Abstract
It is widely recognized that individual decision-making is subject to the evaluation of gains and losses around a reference point. The estimation of discrete choice models increasingly use data from stated choice experiments which are pivoted around a reference alternative. However, to date, the specification of a reference alternative in transport studies has been fixed, whereas it is common to observe individuals adjusting their preferences according to a change in their reference point. This paper focuses on individual reactions, in a freight choice context, to a negative change in the reference alternative values, identifying the behavioural implications in terms of loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity. The results show a significant adjustment in the valuation of gains and losses around a shifted reference alternative. In particular, we find an average increase in loss aversion for cost and time attributes, and a substantial decrease for punctuality. These findings are translated to significant differences in the willingness to pay and willingness to accept measures, providing supporting evidence of respondents' behavioural reaction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 249-271 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Transportation |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Freight choice
- Gains and losses
- Reference alternative
- Willingness to pay
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Development
- Transportation