Senior Management Perspectives and ISO 9000 Effectiveness: An Empirical Research

Andy C. L. Yeung, T. S. Lee, L. Y. Chan

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While ISO 9000 certification is increasingly becoming 'a passport for business' in the marketplace, its effectiveness in enhancing an organization's performance is highly controversial. In recent years, some researchers have argued that the effectiveness of ISO 9000 is highly dependent on management's attitudes to and understanding of the standard, Specifically, we conducted empirical research in the electronics industry to study how the 'objectives of gaining ISO certification', the 'attitudes to implementation' and 'confidence of understanding the standard' among senior management affect the development of a quality management system (QMS) and subsequently organizational performance. We found that although senior management's confidence in their understanding of the standard and quality management is the most influential factor for the development of their QMS and to the induction of changes in systems, it does not improve organizational performance. On the other hand, organizations that believe the ISO 9000 should be adopted for operational objectives and serve as a system foundation for operations achieve the best organizational performance. Our research suggests that ineffectiveness of the ISO 9000 is largely due to incorrect management objectives and expectations from the standard.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-569
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Production Research
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Senior Management Perspectives and ISO 9000 Effectiveness: An Empirical Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this