TY - JOUR
T1 - Seismic behaviour of shear critical square RC columns strengthened by large rupture strain FRP
AU - Mei, Shi Jie
AU - Bai, Yu Lei
AU - Dai, Jian Guo
AU - Han, Qiang
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful for the financial support received from the Natural Science Fund of Beijing (No. 8212003), Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR (No. PolyU 152171/15E), National Natural Science Fund of China (No. 51778019, 51978017), Beijing Nova Programme (No. Z201100006820095), Young Talents Cultivation Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (No. CIT&TCD201904018).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/4/1
Y1 - 2023/4/1
N2 - This paper presents an experimental study on the seismic behaviour of shear critical square columns strengthened by large rupture strain (LRS) FRP under reversed cyclic lateral load together with constant axial load. The experimental program included 2 control columns, 6 LRS FRP-strengthened columns, and 2 CFRP-strengthened columns. The tested specimens’ failure modes, hysteretic responses, ductility, and cumulative energy dissipation were carefully analyzed. The influences of axial load ratio, FRP layers, and FRP type on the seismic performance of these columns were investigated. Compared with the control column, the ductility ratio and energy dissipation of the column wrapped by 3-layer LRS FRP at a low axial load ratio were raised by 491.7 % and 6498.3 %, respectively. The advantage of LRS FRP over CFRP in seismic retrofitting for shear critical RC columns was demonstrated through comparative analysis for the first time. Although the tensile stiffness of 1-layer PET FRP is much smaller than 1-layer CFRP, the ductility ratio and cumulative energy dissipation of the 1-layer PET FRP-strengthened column under a low axial load ratio were still slightly larger than that of the column wrapped by 1-layer CFRP. The CFRP-strengthened column under a high axial load ratio showed sudden explosive failure, while the LRS FRP-strengthened columns exhibited progressive failure. In addition, the axial flexure shear interaction (ASFI) method considering buckling of longitudinal reinforcement in FRP-confined concrete was developed and verified by comparing test results and predicted envelope curves.
AB - This paper presents an experimental study on the seismic behaviour of shear critical square columns strengthened by large rupture strain (LRS) FRP under reversed cyclic lateral load together with constant axial load. The experimental program included 2 control columns, 6 LRS FRP-strengthened columns, and 2 CFRP-strengthened columns. The tested specimens’ failure modes, hysteretic responses, ductility, and cumulative energy dissipation were carefully analyzed. The influences of axial load ratio, FRP layers, and FRP type on the seismic performance of these columns were investigated. Compared with the control column, the ductility ratio and energy dissipation of the column wrapped by 3-layer LRS FRP at a low axial load ratio were raised by 491.7 % and 6498.3 %, respectively. The advantage of LRS FRP over CFRP in seismic retrofitting for shear critical RC columns was demonstrated through comparative analysis for the first time. Although the tensile stiffness of 1-layer PET FRP is much smaller than 1-layer CFRP, the ductility ratio and cumulative energy dissipation of the 1-layer PET FRP-strengthened column under a low axial load ratio were still slightly larger than that of the column wrapped by 1-layer CFRP. The CFRP-strengthened column under a high axial load ratio showed sudden explosive failure, while the LRS FRP-strengthened columns exhibited progressive failure. In addition, the axial flexure shear interaction (ASFI) method considering buckling of longitudinal reinforcement in FRP-confined concrete was developed and verified by comparing test results and predicted envelope curves.
KW - Axial-shear-flexure interaction (ASFI)
KW - Deformation
KW - Large rupture strain (LRS) FRP
KW - Seismic performance
KW - Short column
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147094725
U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115679
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115679
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85147094725
SN - 0141-0296
VL - 280
JO - Engineering Structures
JF - Engineering Structures
M1 - 115679
ER -