TY - JOUR
T1 - Rivals’ Negative Earnings Surprises, Language Signals, and Firms’ Competitive Actions.
AU - Guo, Wei
AU - Sengul, Metin
AU - Yu, Tieying
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Bert Cannella, Jason Shaw, Yu Zhang, Associate Editor Marc Gruber, three anonymous reviewers, and various seminar participants for helpful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong’s General Research Fund (PolyU 255060/15B). The authors contributed equally to this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© Academy of Management Journal.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Research in competitive dynamics has primarily analyzed how characteristics of observable attacks influence firms’ competitive responses. Why and how firms take action in response to critical events that affect their rivals, without being attacked themselves, is less well understood. Focusing on negative earnings surprises, we argue that a focal firm is likely to view a rival’s negative earnings surprise as an opportunity to exploit its vulnerability. Therefore, such surprises are positively associated with the intensity of competitive actions initiated by a focal firm. Furthermore, the complexity and vagueness of a rival’s language in an earnings conference call strengthens the positive relationship between the negative earnings surprise and the focal firm’s intensity of competitive actions. We tested our arguments using data from 3,202 earnings releases and conferences calls of publicly listed firms between 2003 and 2014 in the United States. The results and robustness checks support our predictions.
AB - Research in competitive dynamics has primarily analyzed how characteristics of observable attacks influence firms’ competitive responses. Why and how firms take action in response to critical events that affect their rivals, without being attacked themselves, is less well understood. Focusing on negative earnings surprises, we argue that a focal firm is likely to view a rival’s negative earnings surprise as an opportunity to exploit its vulnerability. Therefore, such surprises are positively associated with the intensity of competitive actions initiated by a focal firm. Furthermore, the complexity and vagueness of a rival’s language in an earnings conference call strengthens the positive relationship between the negative earnings surprise and the focal firm’s intensity of competitive actions. We tested our arguments using data from 3,202 earnings releases and conferences calls of publicly listed firms between 2003 and 2014 in the United States. The results and robustness checks support our predictions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089564273&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5465/amj.2018.0397
DO - 10.5465/amj.2018.0397
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0001-4273
VL - 63
SP - 637
EP - 659
JO - Academy of Management Journal
JF - Academy of Management Journal
IS - 3
ER -