TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) implant failure upon different lateral femoral wall thickness in intertrochanteric fracture: a finite element analysis
AU - Zheng, Liqin
AU - Wong, Duo Wai Chi
AU - Chen, Xinmin
AU - Chen, Yuanzhuang
AU - Li, Pengfei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021/8/11
Y1 - 2021/8/11
N2 - Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) has been commonly used to treat intertrochanteric fractures, despite the risk of implant failure. The integrity of the femur could influence the risk of implant failure. This study evaluated the influence of lateral femoral wall thickness on the potential of implant failure. A finite element model of the hip was reconstructed from the Computed Tomography of a female patient. Five intertrochanteric fracture models at different lateral femoral wall thickness (T1 = 27.6 mm, T2 = 25.4 mm, T3 = 23.4 mm, T4 = 21.4 mm, and T5 = 19.3 mm) were then created and fixed with PFNA. We simulated a critical loading condition by a high loading case during walking. Elastoplastic material models with yield stress and failure strain were applied to the bone and implant in which breakage can be simulated using the element deletion function. In addition, the stress and displacement of the implant and femur were analysed. Implant breakage occurred at the sides of the proximal nail canal in cases of T4 and T5 which was further supported by the higher maximum von Mises stress and nail displacement. The increased stress and displacement of the implant may implicate a reduction of stability and risk of implant failure. We suggested that precaution shall be taken when the wall thickness was less than 21.4 mm.
AB - Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) has been commonly used to treat intertrochanteric fractures, despite the risk of implant failure. The integrity of the femur could influence the risk of implant failure. This study evaluated the influence of lateral femoral wall thickness on the potential of implant failure. A finite element model of the hip was reconstructed from the Computed Tomography of a female patient. Five intertrochanteric fracture models at different lateral femoral wall thickness (T1 = 27.6 mm, T2 = 25.4 mm, T3 = 23.4 mm, T4 = 21.4 mm, and T5 = 19.3 mm) were then created and fixed with PFNA. We simulated a critical loading condition by a high loading case during walking. Elastoplastic material models with yield stress and failure strain were applied to the bone and implant in which breakage can be simulated using the element deletion function. In addition, the stress and displacement of the implant and femur were analysed. Implant breakage occurred at the sides of the proximal nail canal in cases of T4 and T5 which was further supported by the higher maximum von Mises stress and nail displacement. The increased stress and displacement of the implant may implicate a reduction of stability and risk of implant failure. We suggested that precaution shall be taken when the wall thickness was less than 21.4 mm.
KW - computer modelling
KW - fracture mechanics
KW - implant failure simulation
KW - proximal femoral fracture
KW - proximal femoral nail antirotation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112195060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10255842.2021.1964488
DO - 10.1080/10255842.2021.1964488
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85112195060
SN - 1025-5842
VL - 25
JO - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
JF - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
IS - 5
ER -