Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese

Catherine So kum Tang, Anise M S Wu, Joe Y C Tang, Chau Wai Elsie Yan

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)


We examined the reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) when adopted for use in Chinese. The DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling served as the standard against which the classification accuracy of the SOGS was tested. A total of 283 Chinese adults in the community and 94 Chinese treatment-seeking gamblers were recruited. The internal reliability of the SOGS was satisfactory for the general sample and acceptable for the gambling sample. The SOGS was correlated with the DSM-IV criteria items as well as psychosocial and gambling-related problems. Relative to the DSM-IV criteria, the SOGS tended to overestimate the number of pathological gamblers in both samples. In general, we were relatively confident that individuals were not pathological gamblers if the SOGS scores were between 0 and 4 and were pathological gamblers if the SOGS were between 11 and 20. There was about 50-50 chance of being pathological gamblers if the SOGS scores were between 8 and 10. However, the probability of individuals being pathological gamblers was about 0.30 if the SOGS scores were between 5 and 7. We proposed a SOGS cut score of 8 to screen for probable pathological gambling in Chinese societies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-158
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Gambling Studies
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2010
Externally publishedYes


  • Chinese gambling screen
  • Chinese SOGS
  • Pathological gambling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this