TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer
T2 - a cross-sectional study
AU - Li, Mengmeng
AU - Ma, Rui
AU - Zhang, Shanfeng
AU - Wang, Shanshan
AU - Jiao, Jiawei
AU - Liu, Lamei
AU - Wang, Panpan
AU - Zhang, Zhenxiang
AU - Wang, Peng
AU - Li, Xiaoyan
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work was supported by the Innovative Talent Project of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province grant number 20HASTIT047, Foundation of Co-constructing Project of Henan Province and National Health Commission grant number SBGJ202002103, Project of Department of Science and Technology of Henan Province grant number 202102310069, the Medical Education Research Project of Henan Health Commission grant number Wjlx2020362, the Project of Social Science Association in Henan Province grant number SKL-2021-472, the Project of Social Science Association in Henan Province grant number SKL-2021-476 and Philosophy and social science planning project of Henan grant number 2021BSH017.
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2022/4/20
Y1 - 2022/4/20
N2 - Objective The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire among patients with breast cancer in China. Design It was a cross-sectional study, which involved translation, back-translation, cultural adjustment and psychometric testing of a 24-item FaRE Questionnaire. Setting Three tertiary hospitals in Zhengzhou, China: respectively are the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and Henan Provincial People's hospital. Participants A total of 559 patients with breast cancer volunteered to participate in the study Primary outcome measures Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS software V.21.0 and AMOS software V.21.0. Cronbach's α coefficient was used to examine the internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient on 30 participants. The content validity index was calculated based on the values obtained from six expert opinions. Construct validity test was performed using factor analysis including exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results For the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire, the Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.909, and Cronbach's α coefficients of four factors were 0.902, 0.932, 0.905 and 0.963, respectively. The test-retest reliability index of the total questionnaire was 0.905. The Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.97, and Item-Content Validity Index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The questionnaire included 24 items, exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors with loading >0.4, which could explain 72.146% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire had an excellent four-factor model consistent with the original questionnaire. Conclusion The Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity among patients with breast cancer in China. It can effectively assess family resilience and provide basis for personalised family resilience interventions for patients with breast cancer.
AB - Objective The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire among patients with breast cancer in China. Design It was a cross-sectional study, which involved translation, back-translation, cultural adjustment and psychometric testing of a 24-item FaRE Questionnaire. Setting Three tertiary hospitals in Zhengzhou, China: respectively are the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and Henan Provincial People's hospital. Participants A total of 559 patients with breast cancer volunteered to participate in the study Primary outcome measures Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS software V.21.0 and AMOS software V.21.0. Cronbach's α coefficient was used to examine the internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient on 30 participants. The content validity index was calculated based on the values obtained from six expert opinions. Construct validity test was performed using factor analysis including exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results For the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire, the Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.909, and Cronbach's α coefficients of four factors were 0.902, 0.932, 0.905 and 0.963, respectively. The test-retest reliability index of the total questionnaire was 0.905. The Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.97, and Item-Content Validity Index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The questionnaire included 24 items, exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors with loading >0.4, which could explain 72.146% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire had an excellent four-factor model consistent with the original questionnaire. Conclusion The Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity among patients with breast cancer in China. It can effectively assess family resilience and provide basis for personalised family resilience interventions for patients with breast cancer.
KW - health policy
KW - oncology
KW - psychiatry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128793881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35443942
AN - SCOPUS:85128793881
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 4
M1 - e051093
ER -
