TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationships Between Global Orientations and Attitudes Toward Integration Policies
T2 - A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Approach
AU - Au, Algae K.Y.
AU - Ng, Jacky C.K.
AU - Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua
AU - Wu, Wesley C.H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by the Research Grants Council under the General Research Fund (PolyU 154005/14H) and Public Policy Research Funding Scheme (PolyU5006-PPR-11)
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Psychological Association
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objectives: Based upon a mixed methods follow-up explanation model, the present research examined the relationships between global orientations and the attitudes toward integration policies among both locals (majority group) and South Asians (minority group) in Hong Kong. Methods: In Study 1, quantitative data were collected from a community sample of 1,614 adults comprising 1,007 locals and 607 South Asians in three minority groups (Indians, Nepalese, and Pakistanis). In Study 2, a follow-up explanation phase of qualitative investigation was conducted, with 12 in-depth semistructured focus group discussions among seven locals and 49 South Asians, generating three main themes and six subthemes. Results: Quantitative results showed that the positive link between multicultural acquisition and instrumental integration policies was significantly stronger for South Asians than for locals, and that ethnic protection was negatively associated with a positive attitude toward symbolic integration policies in the majority group but had no effects in the minority group. The three main themes generated from the qualitative results include alleviating minority disadvantage, preserving majority privilege, and embracing diversity for the common good.
AB - Objectives: Based upon a mixed methods follow-up explanation model, the present research examined the relationships between global orientations and the attitudes toward integration policies among both locals (majority group) and South Asians (minority group) in Hong Kong. Methods: In Study 1, quantitative data were collected from a community sample of 1,614 adults comprising 1,007 locals and 607 South Asians in three minority groups (Indians, Nepalese, and Pakistanis). In Study 2, a follow-up explanation phase of qualitative investigation was conducted, with 12 in-depth semistructured focus group discussions among seven locals and 49 South Asians, generating three main themes and six subthemes. Results: Quantitative results showed that the positive link between multicultural acquisition and instrumental integration policies was significantly stronger for South Asians than for locals, and that ethnic protection was negatively associated with a positive attitude toward symbolic integration policies in the majority group but had no effects in the minority group. The three main themes generated from the qualitative results include alleviating minority disadvantage, preserving majority privilege, and embracing diversity for the common good.
KW - Ethnic minorities
KW - Global orientations
KW - Integration policies
KW - Mixed methods
KW - Sequential explanatory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139331629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/cdp0000560
DO - 10.1037/cdp0000560
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36107645
AN - SCOPUS:85139331629
SN - 1099-9809
JO - Cultural Diversity and Mental Health
JF - Cultural Diversity and Mental Health
ER -