Abstract
Emergency Department (ED) staff are at greater risk than other staff, of acquiring infectious diseases and inadvertently transmitting pathogens prior to diagnosis. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is crucial in reducing these risks, but what PPE is both sufficiently protective and practicable for routine use is contested. This study explores clinicians' opinions about what PPE is safe and feasible in different patient scenarios, using video clips of experienced clinicians donning and doffing PPE according to current national guidelines. The study aims to develop recommendations for minimum appropriate PPE adherence for frontline ED staff, when assessing newly admitted patients with unknown infectious risks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | S15 |
| Journal | Infection, Disease and Health |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | Supplement 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reintroducing practical logic to PPE use: A video-based survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver