Abstract
Existing social movement theories subsume protests into abstract conceptualizations of society, and current ethnographic studies of protests overburden description. Through a case study of London protests, this article transcends these limitations by articulating a social ecological approach consisting of critical ethnography and autoethnography that unearth the organizational strategies and symbolic representations exchanged among police, protesters, and third-party observers, while mapping the physical and symbolic characteristics of space bearing on these interactions. This approach points to a conceptualization of power at work as transient, typological structures: (a) rooted in collective agency; (b) both mediating and mediated by symbolic representations; (c) whose sensibilities are determined by symbolic interpretations; and (d) thrown into binary opposition between protester power and police power, who mutually represent meanings to resist and be resisted by.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 519-545 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Sociological Quarterly |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2017 |
Keywords
- Collective behavior and social movements
- community and urban sociology
- methodology
- political sociology
- social psychology
- theory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science