Abstract
In this article, we use an experimental approach to examine the effect of reporting regimes on asset prices. We examine four different reporting regimes: the no recognition (NR) regime where no expected future cash flows are recognized; the full recognition (FR) regime where both the expected good news and expected bad news pertaining to the next period cash flows are recognized in current earnings; the good news recognition (GR) regime where only the expected good news pertaining to the next period cash flows are recognized in current earnings; and the bad news recognition (BR) regime where only the expected bad news pertaining to the next period cash flows are recognized in current earnings. We find that the NR, BR, and GR regimes are associated with more intense asset price bubbles than the FR regime. We also find that between the BR and GR regimes, the BR regime is associated with more intense asset price bubbles than the GR regime. Our findings shed insights about how biased (non-neutral) reporting regimes could affect the price formation process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 558-575 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2015 |
Keywords
- asset price bubbles
- fair value accounting
- fundamental values
- neutral accounting
- recognition of future news
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)