Abstract
The econometric measurement of inequality and poverty in advanced capitalist economies has been preoccupied with aggregate measures of relative deprivation, namely, the Gini Index and a relative poverty rate, both of which are based on economic distances from the population median. Using the case of Hong Kong, this article demonstrates the limitations of relative measures: the Gini Index masks social mobility and the relative poverty line understates actual poverty. This article argues instead for a cost-of-living approach to measure poverty, where the poverty line is defined as the cost of essential goods and services. A cost-of-living approach produces a poverty line of HK$28,815 and attendant poverty rate of 44.47% in 2020, nearly double the poverty line of HK$13,450 and poverty rate of 23.6% according to the conventional relative measure of the poverty line set to 50% of median household income—capturing a shortfall of 551,400 poor households that have been overlooked by relative measures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 228 |
| Journal | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Business,Management and Accounting
- General Arts and Humanities
- General Social Sciences
- General Psychology
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reassessing the econometric measurement of inequality and poverty: toward a cost-of-living approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver