Reasons to fight: preliminary results on motivations to combat fake news

Wenting Yu, Qing Yan

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction. To encourage the public to combat online fake news and revalue
truth, it is important to explore the factors that affect individual intention to combat fake news.
Method. This study provides answers using survey data from a representative
sample collected in the U.S. (N = 804).
Analysis. We examined the impacts of planned-behaviour-theory components and prior experience of being deceived by fake news on the intentions of news
verification, fake news refutation, and fact-checks sharing, with demographical
characteristics, media use, and media credibility under control. The study also
examined prior experience as a moderator in the models.
Results. Results showed that subjective norms and prior experience of being
deceived by fake news were positively correlated with intentions of all three
behaviours that help to combat fake news. Prior experience moderated the effect of subjective norms on fake news refutation, and the effect of perceived control on fact-checks sharing.
Conclusion. The findings of this study help scholars and industry practitioners to
understand audiences’ interaction with online information and what drives
audiences to combat information fakeness. Prior experience of being deceived by
fake news is a significant driver
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-49
Number of pages20
JournalInformation Research
Volume29
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • fake news
  • fact-checking
  • verification
  • planned behaviour

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reasons to fight: preliminary results on motivations to combat fake news'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this