Readers’ Response to Szudarski’s (2025) review of ‘Vocabulary, corpus and language teaching. A machine-generated literature overview

Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, Hassan Nejadghanbar

Research output: Journal article publicationComment/debate/erratum

Abstract

It is probably unusual to see a ‘readers response’ to a book review in the ELT Journal. However, this was a rather unusual book review, reviewing a rather unorthodox book. We read with interest and alarm the eloquently written review of the book ‘Vocabulary, corpus and language teaching: A machine-generated literature overview’ by Szudarski’s (2025) in ELT Journal. We commend Szudarski for writing the book review, and the journal for publishing it. We agree with him that the way the authors used GenAI in the reviewed book, ‘cannot be accepted… because it sets a dangerous precedent for the world of publishing’. (p. 3) and wish to respond to his call for more dialogue in the field regarding the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and to ‘consider what skills, knowledge and policies are required to ensure research integrity and the maintenance of high standards in written and published material’ (p. 5).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalEnglish Language Teaching Journal
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2025

Keywords

  • GenAI, AI, academic writing, academic publishing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Readers’ Response to Szudarski’s (2025) review of ‘Vocabulary, corpus and language teaching. A machine-generated literature overview'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this