Randomized trial of anaesthetic interventions in external cephalic version for breech presentation

K. S. Khaw, Wee Yee Shara Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, L. W. Law, T. K. Lau, F. F. Ng, T. Y. Leung

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Successful external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presenting fetus reduces the need for Caesarean section (CS). We aimed to compare the success rate of ECV with either spinal anaesthesia (SA) or i.v. analgesia using remifentanil. Methods: In a double-phased, stratified randomized blinded controlled study we compared the success rates of ECV, performed under spinal anaesthesia (SA), i.v. analgesia (IVA) using remifentanil or no anaesthetic interventions. In phase I, 189 patientswere stratified by parity before randomization to ECV, performed by blinded operators, under SA using either hyperbaric bupivacaine 9mgwith fentanyl 15 μg, i.v. remifentanil infusion 0.1 μg kg min-1, or Control (no anaesthetic intervention). Operators performing ECVwere blinded to the treatment allocation. In phase 2, patients in the Control group inwhomthe initial ECV failedwere further randomized to receive either SA (n=9) or IVA (n=9) for a re-attempt. The primary outcome was the incidence of successful ECV. Results: The success rate in Phase 1 was greatest using SA [52/63 (83%)], compared with IVA [40/63 (64%)] and Control [40/63 (64%)], (P=0.027). Median [IQR] pain scores on a visual analogue scale (range 0-100),were 0 [0-0] with SA, 35 [0-60] with IVA and 50 [30-75] in the Control group (P<0.001). Median [IQR] VAS sedation scores were highest with IVA [75 (50-80)], followed by SA, [0 (0-50)] and Control [0 (0-0)]. In phase 2, 7/9 (78%) of ECV re-attempts were successful with SA, whereas all re-attempts using IVA failed (P=0.0007). The incidence of fetal bradycardia necessitating emergency CS within 30 min, was similar among groups; 1.6% (1/63) in the SA and IVA groups and 3.2% (2/63) in the Control group. Conclusions: SA increased the success rate and reduced pain for both primary and re-attempts of ECV, whereas IVA using remifentanil infusion only reduced the pain. There was no significant increase in the incidence of fetal bradycardia or emergency CS, with ECV performed under anaesthetic interventions. Relaxation of the abdominal muscles from SA appears to underlie the improved outcomes for ECV.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)944-950
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume114
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Keywords

  • Anesthesia regional
  • Anesthesia, spinal
  • Breech presentation
  • External cephalic version
  • Obstetrics
  • Remifentanil, analgesia, obstetric
  • Term birth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this