Abstract
Psych verb constructions show peculiar properties. They appear to project the same θ-relations into inverse configurations (John fears sharks/Sharks frighten John). Furthermore, Experiencer Object psych verb constructions admit backward binding in apparent violation of familiar c-command conditions (Pictures of himself anger John). We offer a solution to both puzzles drawing crucially on data from English and Mandarin. We argue that apparent θ-role inversion is an illusion, and that Experiencer Subject psych verb constructions like John fears sharks are not in fact simple transitive constructions but instead involve a concealed clause with a silent predicate (John fears [cpsharks PRED]). Regarding backward binding, we argue for an updated version of Belletti and Rizzi’s (1988) analysis of Experiencer Object psych verbs in which the putative Theme is a Source that is underlyingly c-commanded by the Experiencer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 127-189 |
| Number of pages | 63 |
| Journal | Natural Language and Linguistic Theory |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 26 Aug 2014 |
Keywords
- Applicatives
- Concealed complement clauses
- English
- Intensionality
- Mandarin
- Psych verbs
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Psych verbs in English and Mandarin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver