Abstract
Psych verb constructions show peculiar properties. They appear to project the same θ-relations into inverse configurations (John fears sharks/Sharks frighten John). Furthermore, Experiencer Object psych verb constructions admit backward binding in apparent violation of familiar c-command conditions (Pictures of himself anger John). We offer a solution to both puzzles drawing crucially on data from English and Mandarin. We argue that apparent θ-role inversion is an illusion, and that Experiencer Subject psych verb constructions like John fears sharks are not in fact simple transitive constructions but instead involve a concealed clause with a silent predicate (John fears [cpsharks PRED]). Regarding backward binding, we argue for an updated version of Belletti and Rizzi’s (1988) analysis of Experiencer Object psych verbs in which the putative Theme is a Source that is underlyingly c-commanded by the Experiencer.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 127-189 |
Number of pages | 63 |
Journal | Natural Language and Linguistic Theory |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 26 Aug 2014 |
Keywords
- Applicatives
- Concealed complement clauses
- English
- Intensionality
- Mandarin
- Psych verbs
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language