Providing Justice for Low-Income Youths: Publicly Funded Lawyers and Youth Clients in Hong Kong

Kevin Kwok yin Cheng, Wing Hong Chui, Rebecca Ong

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


Despite the undercurrents of rights protection in Hong Kong’s juvenile justice procedure, the ultimate goal remains punishment based on welfare needs. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 40 youth defendants and defence lawyers, this article will examine the ways in which youth defendants and defence lawyers negotiate the welfare and justice imperatives of the Hong Kong juvenile justice system and end up accepting the disciplinary welfare model. Publicly funded lawyers have become primarily plea mitigators, assisting the state in seeing to the welfare and ‘the best interests of the child’. A study of Hong Kong will lead to a broader understanding of how a welfare-oriented system can work in a time when juvenile justice systems around the world emphasize human rights, due process and children’s rights.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-593
Number of pages17
JournalSocial and Legal Studies
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes


  • Disciplinary welfare model
  • juvenile justice
  • legal representation
  • low-income youths
  • publicly funded lawyers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Providing Justice for Low-Income Youths: Publicly Funded Lawyers and Youth Clients in Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this