Prosocial norms as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review

Man Hong Andrew Siu, Tan Lei Shek, Ben Law

Research output: Chapter in book / Conference proceedingChapter in an edited book (as author)Academic researchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Prosocial norms like reciprocity, social responsibility, altruism, and volunteerism are ethical standards and beliefs that youth development programs often want to promote. This chapter reviews evolutionary, social-cognitive, and developmental theories of prosocial development, and analyze how young people learn and adopt prosocial norms. The review showed that very few current theories explicitly address the issue of how prosocial norms, in form of feelings of moral obligations, may be challenged by a norm of self-interest and social circumstances, when prosocial acts are needed. It is necessary to develop theories which put prosocial norms as a central construct, and a new social cognitive theory of norm activation has the potential to help us understand how prosocial norms may be applied. This review also highlights how little we know about how young people perceive and receive prosocial norms, and how influential are school policies and peer influence on the prosocial development. Lastly, while training of interpersonal competence (e.g. empathy, moral reasoning, etc.) was commonly used in the youth development, their effectiveness was not systematically evaluated. It will also be interesting to examine how computer and information technology or video games may be used in e-learning of prosocial norms.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPositive Youth Development
Subtitle of host publicationTheory, Research and Application
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)9781620813058
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Prosocial norms as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this