ProsCan for Couples: A feasibility study for evaluating peer support within a controlled research design

Suzanne K. Chambers, Leslie Schover, Kim Halford, Megan Ferguson, R. A. Gardiner, Stefano Occhipinti, Jeff Dunn

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The present study assessed the feasibility of delivering peer support for couples coping with prostate cancer within a trial design. Methods/Design Ten peer volunteers completed training in research protocols and delivering tele-based couples support to men with prostate cancer and their partners. Twenty couples received an eight session intervention and were assessed before surgery and 3 and 6 months subsequently for adjustment outcomes. A focus group investigated the peers' experiences. Results Peers were motivated by altruism, a belief in research, and reported personal growth. The research protocol at times conflicted with lay models of helping, and the focus on sexuality and couples was challenging. Distress decreased over time but more so for partners; unmet sexuality needs did not improve. Conclusion Peer support appears promising as a model to support couples facing prostate cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-479
Number of pages5
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Keywords

  • couples intervention
  • peer support
  • prostate cancer
  • psychosocial adjustment
  • sexuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Oncology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ProsCan for Couples: A feasibility study for evaluating peer support within a controlled research design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this