TY - JOUR
T1 - Process safety assessment of thermal technologies for biomass valorization by numerical descriptive approach
AU - Ayub, Yousaf
AU - Zhou, Jianzhao
AU - Shi, Tao
AU - Ren, Jingzheng
N1 - Funding Information:
The work described in this paper was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region , China-General Research Fund (Project ID: P0037749 , Funding Body Ref. No: 15303921 , Project No. Q88R ), and the Research Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University under student account code RHWR. The work described in this paper was also supported by a grant from Research Institute for Advanced Manufacturing (RIAM), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University ( PolyU ) (Project No. 1-CD4J , Project ID: P0041367 ) and a grant from Research Centre for Resources Engineering towards Carbon Neutrality (RCRE), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) (Project No. 1-BBEC , Project ID: P0043023 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Institution of Chemical Engineers
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Process-based safety assessment of biomass thermal valorization technologies including hydrothermal gasification (HTG), pyrolysis, and conventional gasification has been evaluated based on the Numerical Descriptive Logistics Equation (NuD). Process-related data such as temperature, pressure, heat of reaction, and process inventory were collected from the literature for this purpose. The data has been analyzed by using the NuD equations to obtain the process safety total score (PSTS), and then hierarchy of control (HOC) has been applied to propose the strategies for risk mitigation. According to the NuD results, the HTG process has a lower PSTS (210.2) compared with pyrolysis (226.4) and gasification (228.5), and it reveals that HTG is the safest among these three technologies. HTG has the highest score for pressure (60.48) because it has the high pressure (20–25 MPa) process requirement, but the lowest scores for temperature and heat of reaction due to lower temperature operations (374–400 °C) compared with pyrolysis and gasification. The results determined by the NuD have been compared with subjective safety evaluation methods (Process Safety Index Analysis and Inherent Safety Index), and the results of inherent safety index (ISI) are also consistent with that determined by the NuD. Hierarchy of control has been proposed to control and reduce the process risk. As per results, engineering and administrative measures could be drafted for more effective process safety control.
AB - Process-based safety assessment of biomass thermal valorization technologies including hydrothermal gasification (HTG), pyrolysis, and conventional gasification has been evaluated based on the Numerical Descriptive Logistics Equation (NuD). Process-related data such as temperature, pressure, heat of reaction, and process inventory were collected from the literature for this purpose. The data has been analyzed by using the NuD equations to obtain the process safety total score (PSTS), and then hierarchy of control (HOC) has been applied to propose the strategies for risk mitigation. According to the NuD results, the HTG process has a lower PSTS (210.2) compared with pyrolysis (226.4) and gasification (228.5), and it reveals that HTG is the safest among these three technologies. HTG has the highest score for pressure (60.48) because it has the high pressure (20–25 MPa) process requirement, but the lowest scores for temperature and heat of reaction due to lower temperature operations (374–400 °C) compared with pyrolysis and gasification. The results determined by the NuD have been compared with subjective safety evaluation methods (Process Safety Index Analysis and Inherent Safety Index), and the results of inherent safety index (ISI) are also consistent with that determined by the NuD. Hierarchy of control has been proposed to control and reduce the process risk. As per results, engineering and administrative measures could be drafted for more effective process safety control.
KW - Biomass valorization
KW - Process Safety
KW - Quantitative Risk
KW - Risk Control
KW - Safety Assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147378496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.psep.2023.01.075
DO - 10.1016/j.psep.2023.01.075
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85147378496
SN - 0957-5820
VL - 171
SP - 803
EP - 811
JO - Process Safety and Environmental Protection
JF - Process Safety and Environmental Protection
ER -