TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Expository Text Processing
T2 - Causal Content Density as a Critical Expository Text Metric
AU - Follmer, D. Jake
AU - Li, Ping
AU - Clariana, Roy
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (BCS-1533625). Any opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2021/5/17
Y1 - 2021/5/17
N2 - In this investigation, we examine the contribution of intrinsic content density (ICD) to measures of expository text processing. In Studies 1 and 2, the factor structure of select text density metrics was examined and refined using two text samples (Ns = 150) randomly selected from an expository text corpus. Scores on the ICD measure based on the entire text sample (N = 300) explained unique variance in readability and text easability. In Study 3, ICD predicted adults’ text ratings of interest and ease of comprehension above and beyond established easability measures. Participants’ text familiarity moderated the relation between ICD and ease of comprehension, revealing a density-facilitative effect for participants more familiar with the text content. Finally, in Study 4, measures of text difficulty, processing, and comprehension were obtained from adult readers using 10 researcher-constructed science texts; evidence of descriptive density effects on each measure was obtained. Implications for future research are discussed.
AB - In this investigation, we examine the contribution of intrinsic content density (ICD) to measures of expository text processing. In Studies 1 and 2, the factor structure of select text density metrics was examined and refined using two text samples (Ns = 150) randomly selected from an expository text corpus. Scores on the ICD measure based on the entire text sample (N = 300) explained unique variance in readability and text easability. In Study 3, ICD predicted adults’ text ratings of interest and ease of comprehension above and beyond established easability measures. Participants’ text familiarity moderated the relation between ICD and ease of comprehension, revealing a density-facilitative effect for participants more familiar with the text content. Finally, in Study 4, measures of text difficulty, processing, and comprehension were obtained from adult readers using 10 researcher-constructed science texts; evidence of descriptive density effects on each measure was obtained. Implications for future research are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106321734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02702711.2021.1912867
DO - 10.1080/02702711.2021.1912867
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0270-2711
VL - 42
SP - 625
EP - 662
JO - Reading Psychology
JF - Reading Psychology
IS - 6
ER -