Planning following stroke: A relational complexity approach using the Tower of London

G. Andrews, G.S. Halford, M. Chappell, A. Maujean, Ho Keung David Shum

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2014Andrews, Halford.Planning on the 4-disk version of the Tower of London (TOL4) was examined in stroke patients and unimpaired controls. Over all TOL4 solution scores indicated impaired planning in the frontal stroke but not non-frontal stroke patients. Consistent with the claim that processing the relations between current states, intermediate states, and goal states is a key process in planning, the domain-general relational complexity metric was a good indicator of the experienced difficulty of TOL4 problems. The relational complexity metric shared variance with task-specific metrics of moves to solution and search depth. Frontal stroke patients showed impaired planning compared to controls on problems at all three complexity levels, but at only two of the three levels of moves to solution, search depth and goal ambiguity. Non-frontal stroke patients showed impaired planning only on the most difficult quaternary-relational and high search depth problems. An independent measure of relational processing (viz., Latin square task) predicted TOL4 solution scores after controlling for stroke status and location, and executive processing (Trail Making Test). The ffndings suggest that planning involves a domain-general capacity for relational processing that depends on the frontal brain regions
Original languageEnglish
Article number1032
JournalDefault journal
Volume8
Issue numberDEC
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Dec 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Frontal lobes
  • Goal ambiguity
  • Moves to solution
  • Planning
  • Relational complexity
  • Search depth
  • Stroke
  • Tower of London

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this