Performance and complexity comparison of CPE algorithms for 256-QAM optical signals

S.M. Bilal; G. Bosco; J. Cheng; Pak Tao Lau; Chao Lu

Performance and complexity comparison of CPE algorithms for 256-QAM optical signals

S.M. Bilal, G. Bosco, J. Cheng, Pak Tao Lau, Chao Lu

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Research output: Chapter in book / Conference proceeding › Conference article published in proceeding or book › Academic research › peer-review

Abstract

A detailed analysis of different CPE schemes for 256- QAM signals is presented. Viterbi algorithms demonstrate very poor performance, while the best compromise between complexity and performance is achieved using the BPS+MLE algorithm.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OFC 2015
Publisher	OSA - The Optical Society
ISBN (Print)	9781557529374
Publication status	Published - 2015

Cite this

@inproceedings{cdfaf89519d0466d9cda326544b91579,

title = "Performance and complexity comparison of CPE algorithms for 256-QAM optical signals",

abstract = "A detailed analysis of different CPE schemes for 256- QAM signals is presented. Viterbi algorithms demonstrate very poor performance, while the best compromise between complexity and performance is achieved using the BPS+MLE algorithm.",

author = "S.M. Bilal and G. Bosco and J. Cheng and Lau, {Pak Tao} and Chao Lu",

year = "2015",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781557529374",

booktitle = "Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OFC 2015",

publisher = "OSA - The Optical Society",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Performance and complexity comparison of CPE algorithms for 256-QAM optical signals

AU - Bilal, S.M.

AU - Bosco, G.

AU - Cheng, J.

AU - Lau, Pak Tao

AU - Lu, Chao

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A detailed analysis of different CPE schemes for 256- QAM signals is presented. Viterbi algorithms demonstrate very poor performance, while the best compromise between complexity and performance is achieved using the BPS+MLE algorithm.

AB - A detailed analysis of different CPE schemes for 256- QAM signals is presented. Viterbi algorithms demonstrate very poor performance, while the best compromise between complexity and performance is achieved using the BPS+MLE algorithm.

M3 - Conference article published in proceeding or book

SN - 9781557529374

BT - Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OFC 2015

PB - OSA - The Optical Society

ER -

Performance and complexity comparison of CPE algorithms for 256-QAM optical signals

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this