TY - JOUR
T1 - Partial GNSS ambiguity resolution in coordinate domain
AU - Ji, Shengyue
AU - Du, Rongyao
AU - Chen, Wu
AU - Wang, Zhenjie
AU - He, Kaifei
AU - Nie, Zhixi
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was substantially supported by Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41631073), funded by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission [project no. JCYJ20170818104822282], Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [grant no. ZR2016DM15, ZR2016DQ01 and ZR2017MD021], National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant no. 41704021, 41701513 and 41604027], the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [grant no. 18CX02064A and 16CX02026A] and Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [grant no. QNLM2016ORP0401].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Survey Review Ltd.
PY - 2019/11/2
Y1 - 2019/11/2
N2 - Traditionally, if full ambiguity resolution is not successful, partial ambiguity resolution (PAR) will be tried. However, identifying which subset of ambiguities to fix is not easy and is still an open problem. Since the actual purpose of most applications is positioning, rather than fixing all or part of the ambiguities, in this research, we are trying to bypass the problem of identifying which subset of ambiguities to fix and provide a partial solution in the coordinate domain for the bias-free case. The basic idea is that with a user-defined failure rate, we can find a group of ambiguity candidates and each will provide one position. The partial solution is constructed based on these positions together with an indicator to show its maximum positioning error with user-defined reliability. In order to meet various user requirements, different kinds of partial solutions in coordinate domain are proposed. Different from the traditional PAR methods, the new method still works with all the ambiguities (i.e. the complete vector), but works with the different possible values that the complete ambiguity vector may take. The validness and applicability of the proposed partial solution are demonstrated-based practical BeiDou triple-frequency observations. Numerical results show that some partial solutions can be more accurate, while others can meet higher reliability or integrity requirement.
AB - Traditionally, if full ambiguity resolution is not successful, partial ambiguity resolution (PAR) will be tried. However, identifying which subset of ambiguities to fix is not easy and is still an open problem. Since the actual purpose of most applications is positioning, rather than fixing all or part of the ambiguities, in this research, we are trying to bypass the problem of identifying which subset of ambiguities to fix and provide a partial solution in the coordinate domain for the bias-free case. The basic idea is that with a user-defined failure rate, we can find a group of ambiguity candidates and each will provide one position. The partial solution is constructed based on these positions together with an indicator to show its maximum positioning error with user-defined reliability. In order to meet various user requirements, different kinds of partial solutions in coordinate domain are proposed. Different from the traditional PAR methods, the new method still works with all the ambiguities (i.e. the complete vector), but works with the different possible values that the complete ambiguity vector may take. The validness and applicability of the proposed partial solution are demonstrated-based practical BeiDou triple-frequency observations. Numerical results show that some partial solutions can be more accurate, while others can meet higher reliability or integrity requirement.
KW - Ambiguity validation
KW - GNSS
KW - Partial ambiguity resolution
KW - Partial solution in coordinate domain
KW - RTK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049858696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00396265.2018.1490870
DO - 10.1080/00396265.2018.1490870
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85049858696
SN - 0039-6265
VL - 51
SP - 525
EP - 532
JO - Survey Review
JF - Survey Review
IS - 369
ER -