Abstract
The experimental data obtained in five different cases, i.e., one case of the jet in a wave only environment, two cases of the jet in a cross-flow only environment and two cases of the jet in a wave and cross-flow coexisting environment, are used to validate the model. The grid sensitivity tests are conducted based on four different grid systems and the results illustrate that the non-uniform grid system C (205×99×126 nodes with the minimum size of 1/10 jet diameter) is sufficiently fine for the modelling. The comparative study shows that the wave-current non-linear interaction should be taken into account at the inflow boundary while modelling the jet in wave and cross-flow coexisting environments. All numerical results agree well with the experimental data, showing that: (1) the jet under the influence of the wave action has a faster centerline velocity decay and a higher turbulence level than that in the stagnant ambience, meanwhile the “twin peaks” phenomenon exists on the cross-sectional velocity profiles, (2) the jet under a cross-flow scenario is deflected along the cross-flow with the node in the downstream, (3) the jet in wave and cross-flow coexisting environments has a flow structure of “effluent clouds”, which enhances the mixing of the jet with surrounding waters.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 778-793 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Hydrodynamics |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2016 |
Keywords
- cross-flow
- large eddy simulation (LES)
- turbulent jet
- wave
- wave and cross-flow coexisting
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Modelling and Simulation
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Mechanics of Materials
- Mechanical Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling of a non-buoyant vertical jet in waves and currents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver