Locking in overseas buyers amid geopolitical conflicts

Di Fan, Pengcheng Ma (Corresponding Author), Lin Cui, Daphne W. Yiu

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Geopolitical conflicts, particularly economic ones, introduce significant uncertainties into the global supply chain. The impact of these conflicts on cross-border buyer–supplier transactions remains underexplored, as does the capability of global suppliers to mitigate such risks by locking in their foreign buyers. Employing a combined perspective of resource dependence theory and transaction cost economics, we examine a natural experiment to investigate the effects of the 2018 U.S.–China trade war on the transactional relationships between Chinese suppliers and their U.S. buyers. Our study reveals that the trade war generally adversely affected these buyer–supplier transactional relationships, leading to a negative abnormal transaction value in the affected dyads, which amounted to 18.42% of their pre-event level. However, we find that this adverse impact can be attenuated when Chinese suppliers demonstrate superior innovation capabilities, higher corporate social responsibility performance, or fewer local political ties. These findings yield insights for international suppliers and buyers on strategies to maintain buyer–supplier transactions and minimize the detrimental effects on global supply chain relationships during geopolitical conflicts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)756-792
Number of pages37
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume70
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • cross-border buyer–supplier relationship
  • event study
  • geopolitical
  • lock-in
  • trade war

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Locking in overseas buyers amid geopolitical conflicts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this