Interprofessional relations in interpreted lawyer-client interviews. An Australian case study

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

Abstract

Generating data from an online survey of 25 lawyers and 85 interpreters in Australia, this study explores the interprofessional relations between lawyers and interpreters when they work together in private legal interviews. The findings show that the majority of the lawyers and the interpreters were satisfied with their working relations and positive about further improvements and training. However, lawyers did not view those interpreters who acted in contravention of their code of ethics as equal professionals. Because of a misconception about interpreting credentials, lawyers were unable to link interpreters’ varying professional competence to their different training levels. At the same time, interpreters lacked confidence to regard themselves as professionals equal to lawyers. Further, statistically significant correlations were found between interpreters’ combined training and accreditation levels and their attitudes towards their relations with the lawyers. The findings of this study have practical implications for the improvement of interpreted legal services.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)608-624
JournalPerspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice
Volume29
Issue number4
Early online date3 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Interprofessional relations
  • interpreted lawyer-client interviews
  • ethics
  • professionalism
  • legal interpreting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interprofessional relations in interpreted lawyer-client interviews. An Australian case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this