TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating physical index and self-organizing mapping for aerosol dust detection (PISOM) over Himawari-8 AHI satellite images
AU - Li, Jing
AU - Wong, Man Sing
AU - Nazeer, Majid
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was substantially supported by the General Research Fund (Grant No. 15603920 and 15609421 ), and Collaborative Research Fund (Grant No. C7064-18 GF , C5062-21 GF ), from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council, Hong Kong, China . We particularly acknowledge the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) for providing access to the Himawari-8 observation data ( https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ptree/index.html ). Thanks are also given to ECMWF for providing wind field data ( https://www.ecmwf.int/ ).
Funding Information:
This work was substantially supported by the General Research Fund (Grant No. 15603920 and 15609421), and Collaborative Research Fund (Grant No. C7064-18 GF, C5062-21 GF), from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council, Hong Kong, China. We particularly acknowledge the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) for providing access to the Himawari-8 observation data (https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ptree/index.html). Thanks are also given to ECMWF for providing wind field data (https://www.ecmwf.int/).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/9/15
Y1 - 2023/9/15
N2 - Dust detection from satellite images has been explored with both physical dust index method and machine learning method. However, both methods have their own limitations. The dust index method is threshold dependent and uses limited satellite observations, whilst the machine learning method requires a large quantity of training data and is generally physically uninterpretable. Besides, previous studies give definite detection results, i.e., 1 and 0 representing dust and non-dust. In actual situations, dusts could be mixed with clouds, and thin dust plumes can be regarded as a mixture of dusts and land surfaces. To tackle these problems, this study proposes a new method that integrates physical, machine learning, and analytical methods, namely Physical Index and Self-Organizing Mapping (SOM) integrated detection method (PISOM). It first uses physical indices to extract all dust-like pixels. Then the preliminary detection results were refined with a well-trained SOM model. Finally, it calculated the particle-type ratios for each dust-like pixel with an analytical method. The PISOM has been testified for dust aerosol detection over Northern China using Himawari-8 AHI satellite images. It was cross-compared with the two classical physical dust indices of brightness temperature difference (BTD) and normalized difference dust index (NDDI) on 5732 samples of heavy dust (HD), thin dust (TD), desert surface (DS), and thin cloud (TIC), which were manually extracted from historical dust storm cases. The results show that PISOM has the highest accuracy score (0.930) than the BTD (0.890) and NDDI (0.700). The confusion matrix of PISOM for the four types reveals that the PISOM misclassifies 29 and 325 samples of HD and TD as TIC. An in-depth examination reveals that these misclassified samples are mixtures of HD and TD with TIC, which indicates the effectiveness of PISOM in interpreting the mixture cases. Moreover, application on typical dust storm cases demonstrates that the PISOM performs well over different regions and under various illumination conditions. Importantly, the quantified dust detection results make the PISOM application-oriented, i.e., the results can be used to estimate dust-affected areas or quantify the probability of dust ratio over particular pixel(s).
AB - Dust detection from satellite images has been explored with both physical dust index method and machine learning method. However, both methods have their own limitations. The dust index method is threshold dependent and uses limited satellite observations, whilst the machine learning method requires a large quantity of training data and is generally physically uninterpretable. Besides, previous studies give definite detection results, i.e., 1 and 0 representing dust and non-dust. In actual situations, dusts could be mixed with clouds, and thin dust plumes can be regarded as a mixture of dusts and land surfaces. To tackle these problems, this study proposes a new method that integrates physical, machine learning, and analytical methods, namely Physical Index and Self-Organizing Mapping (SOM) integrated detection method (PISOM). It first uses physical indices to extract all dust-like pixels. Then the preliminary detection results were refined with a well-trained SOM model. Finally, it calculated the particle-type ratios for each dust-like pixel with an analytical method. The PISOM has been testified for dust aerosol detection over Northern China using Himawari-8 AHI satellite images. It was cross-compared with the two classical physical dust indices of brightness temperature difference (BTD) and normalized difference dust index (NDDI) on 5732 samples of heavy dust (HD), thin dust (TD), desert surface (DS), and thin cloud (TIC), which were manually extracted from historical dust storm cases. The results show that PISOM has the highest accuracy score (0.930) than the BTD (0.890) and NDDI (0.700). The confusion matrix of PISOM for the four types reveals that the PISOM misclassifies 29 and 325 samples of HD and TD as TIC. An in-depth examination reveals that these misclassified samples are mixtures of HD and TD with TIC, which indicates the effectiveness of PISOM in interpreting the mixture cases. Moreover, application on typical dust storm cases demonstrates that the PISOM performs well over different regions and under various illumination conditions. Importantly, the quantified dust detection results make the PISOM application-oriented, i.e., the results can be used to estimate dust-affected areas or quantify the probability of dust ratio over particular pixel(s).
KW - Advanced Himawari Imager
KW - Dust detection
KW - Dust physical index
KW - Himawari-8
KW - Self-organizing mapping
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85164401960
U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119921
DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119921
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85164401960
SN - 1352-2310
VL - 309
JO - Atmospheric Environment
JF - Atmospheric Environment
M1 - 119921
ER -