TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated design process of green building projects
T2 - A review towards assessment metrics and conceptual framework
AU - Ikudayisi, Ayodele Emmanuel
AU - Chan, Albert P.C.
AU - Darko, Amos
AU - Adegun, Olumuyiwa Bayode
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper forms part of a PhD study entitled “Appraisal of Integrated Design Process and Green Building Delivery” from which other deliverables may be published with different objectives but sharing common background. The authors are grateful for a PhD Exchange Programme Scholarship awarded to the first author by The Federal University of Technology Akure , Nigeria and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hong Kong.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Integrated design process (IDP) as an innovative and collaborative design approach for green building (GB) delivery has gained recognition in practice over the past decade. Yet, a significant knowledge gap exists theoretically and practically on how the process can be assessed for possible improvement. The purpose of this paper is to develop evaluation metrics and a conceptual framework for assessing IDP of green building projects. Through a critical review and content analysis of extant industry guidelines, models, and peer-reviewed articles, four sets of IDP metrics were identified. The first metric focuses on the project's attributes, including cost, complexity, scope, as well as intended sustainability features. The second set pertained to process attributes, including goal-setting process, delivery system, timing of activities, as well as communication-related issues. The third metric concerned team attributes, ranging from team members' resourcefulness, competency, and skilled recourse. The client attributes within the organizational and managerial context represent the fourth metric. A framework was proposed which established the relationship between IDP indicators and green building delivery performance. The proposed framework would be beneficial for research into IDP effectiveness as well as aiding practice, policy decisions, and development of new IDP guidelines. The possibility of decision support models through innovative algorithm and digitalized platform was brought to the fore.
AB - Integrated design process (IDP) as an innovative and collaborative design approach for green building (GB) delivery has gained recognition in practice over the past decade. Yet, a significant knowledge gap exists theoretically and practically on how the process can be assessed for possible improvement. The purpose of this paper is to develop evaluation metrics and a conceptual framework for assessing IDP of green building projects. Through a critical review and content analysis of extant industry guidelines, models, and peer-reviewed articles, four sets of IDP metrics were identified. The first metric focuses on the project's attributes, including cost, complexity, scope, as well as intended sustainability features. The second set pertained to process attributes, including goal-setting process, delivery system, timing of activities, as well as communication-related issues. The third metric concerned team attributes, ranging from team members' resourcefulness, competency, and skilled recourse. The client attributes within the organizational and managerial context represent the fourth metric. A framework was proposed which established the relationship between IDP indicators and green building delivery performance. The proposed framework would be beneficial for research into IDP effectiveness as well as aiding practice, policy decisions, and development of new IDP guidelines. The possibility of decision support models through innovative algorithm and digitalized platform was brought to the fore.
KW - Conceptual framework
KW - Delivery performance
KW - Green building
KW - Integrated design process
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124319013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104180
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104180
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85124319013
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 50
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
M1 - 104180
ER -