Informal fallacies as cognitive heuristics in public health reasoning

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)


The public must make assessments of a range of health-related issues. However, these as-sessments require scientific know-ledge which is often lacking or inef-fectively utilized by the public. Lay people must use whatever cognitive resources are at their disposal to come to judgement on these issues. It will be contended that a group of arguments-so-called informal fal-lacies-are a valuable cognitive re-source in this regard. These argu-ments serve as cognitive heuristics which facilitate reasoning when knowledge is limited or beyond the grasp of reasoners. The results of an investigation into the use of these arguments by the public are reported.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-37
Number of pages37
JournalInformal Logic
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes


  • Argument from authority
  • Argument from ignorance
  • Cognitive heuristic
  • Informal fallacies
  • Public health
  • Reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Informal fallacies as cognitive heuristics in public health reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this