How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools?

Robert Phillip Wright, Sotirios E. Paroutis, Daniela P. Blettner

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

121 Citations (Scopus)


Strategic tools are indispensible for business and competitive analysis. Yet we know very little about managers' internal logic as they put these tools into practical use. We situate our study in a business school context using action learning prior to the manifestation of practice to complement our understanding of practice. Using Personal Construct Theory and Repertory Grids, our mid-range theorizing showed that, contrary to current thinking about strategic tools, managers think in dualities (often paradoxically) and have a preference for multiple-tools-in-use, tools that provide different perspectives, peripheral vision, connected thinking, simultaneously help differentiate and integrate complex issues, and guide the thinking process. These findings are important for designing better tools and the nurturing of critical managerial competencies needed for a complicated world. Our study's focus also has wider implications for scholars as we see our own material evaluated by those who will put these lessons into practice. Journal of Management Studies
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-125
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes


  • Internal logic
  • Management education
  • Managerial cognition
  • Personal construct theory
  • Strategic tools
  • Strategy-as-practice
  • Usefulness of tools and theories

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation


Dive into the research topics of 'How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this