Abstract
We adopt contemporaneous, nonradial and variable returns to scale assumptions in a data envelopment analysis (DEA) exercise to address the inefficiency problem in Chinese industries in different policy regimes using a newly constructed data set for 24 Chinese manufacturing industries in 1952–2008. While confirming that the central planning period was indeed a ‘graveyard’ for productivity that entailed severe technical regress and efficiency losses, we do not find a steady improvement in efficiency during the reform period despite strong technical progress. We argue that the resurgent prominence of the government and the state sector since the late 1990s, especially following China’s World Trade Organization accession, has obstructed the efficiency improvement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4275-4298 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Applied Economics |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 40 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- economic transition in China
- Malmquist indices
- technical efficiency (TE)
- technical progress (TP)
- total factor productivity (TFP)
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Has China’s fast industrial growth been efficient? An industry-level investigation with a newly constructed data set'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver